Saturday, April 8, 2017

The Case Against Saving Copper Cents

There are Coin Roll Hunters who will save pre-82 copper cents.  They are not 100% copper.  The US mint stopped using 100% copper when produced began on the Flying Eagle Cent.  Lincoln Memorial Cents were produced with 'French Brass", a mix of 95% copper, 5% tin and zinc.  Nonetheless, the idea is sound: the value of the metal content of the coin is greater than the face value of the coin.  If the coins can be melted down, a premium can be realized.  At the time of this writing, the melt value of a pre 1982 95% copper cent is 1.8¢.  An 80% return on investment would get anyone's attention.   If not for the prohibition against melting down cents, a vast quantity would be removed from circulation in a hurry.  It's not just the copper, the zinc cents would be removed as part of a sorting operation.  In addition, an uninformed public would likely hoard all cents when they catch wind that something is up.  Right now, the percentage of copper in circulation is about 15%.  Perhaps one day when that percentage drops to a level that becomes unattractive to machine sorting operations the law will be repealed.  It is the hope that the law will be repealed that invites some folks to hoard copper now, while they are plentiful. 
After the coin shortage of the mid 60, when silver was removed from US coinage, the US government did not want a repeat situation when it transitioned from copper cents to zinc.  As a result the No-Melt law was passed, prohibiting the melting of those copper cents in order to profit from the enterprise.   See 31 CFR 82.1 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/31/82.1.

The idea of getting 1.8¢ for each penny in your stash is deceptive.  Copper cents, being 5% tin and zinc, would be considered #2 copper for recycling purposes.  Looking at today's prices, #2 copper commands a price of $1.97/pound, 74.6% of the copper spot price.  Without a doubt the recycling centers would want to run your coins through a ryedale sorter before they handed over good money, further increasing their costs and decreasing what they would pay you.  Small amounts, under 100 pounds, are not be of interest to a lot of these recycling centers.  It costs them too much in labor to tally up the load and write a check.  Aluminum cans are a fine example of small volume scrapping.  Recycling yards are paying 25¢/pound, barely 28% of aluminum spot at 88¢/pound.  A minimum load of 100 pounds demands 3300 cans.  Yes, they'll pay you $25, but if it costs you $10 in fuel to get there and back hauling a trailer you really need a giant load to make it worthwhile.  To make a profit on your cents, the price of copper would need to be terrifically high, you would need a lot of them, and you'd still have to bear the cost of transporting all those cents to the recycle center.  When you hit the $600 mark, you get 1099 paperwork added to the mix because the gubmint wants a piece of the action

In the event the No-Melt were to be repealed smelting operations would pop up all over the country.  Industrial sites, recycling centers, machine shops, and backyard operations would spring up like weeds after the rain.  If the metal content of your cents is 1.8¢, the best you can hope for is 75% of that.  Extracting pure copper from French Brass is expensive.  If you could get 75% of melt value that would be a miracle.  The scrapyards have to transport coins, pay for equipment, energy to melt them down, labor and administration, and still turn a profit.  Using aluminum as a reference, copper spot would have to be in the $5-6/pound range for you to break even.  Cents would disappear, being melted down for their copper content.  The resulting flood of copper bullion on the market would see the copper spot price crash. 

With each passing year billions of new cents are produced with the effect of diluting the copper cent population.  In the last box I counted the copper was 12.4% of the total after 30+ years of zinc cent production.  It needs to be cost prohibitive to sort the cents or a shortage of circulating coins will occur.  There is a greater chance the cent will be eliminated long before copper is diluted to a point it is not worthwhile to sort.  Canada has already eliminated their cent and provide the example for the US to follow: banks are required to return cents to the Canadian Mint.  It will be gubmint that snatches up all the copper when cents are returned to the treasury.  The No-Melt law will not be repealed.  It would cost the gubmint Billions.

Copper cents are an asset that will never perform.  I do not save those non-BU copper cents.  I search my boxes, pick out a few dozen coins that I consider worthwhile, and deposit the rest, including all those copper cents.

Opportunity Cost

Part of making an investment is comparing options and alternatives.  By choosing to hoard copper you elect not to make a different investment with those funds.  Opportunity Cost is the missed return on investment from an alternative.  Those same funds, invested in an alternative, can easily outperform the potential gain from hoarding copper.

Example
Lets say 2 people, Joe and Jim, have $100 in copper cents.
Joe elects to keep his copper in the hopes that one day legislation will change to allow melting the copper, refining costs make it feasible, and demand rises to a point that he can receive a return on his investment.
Jim takes his $100 to his drop bank, exchanges them for $100.
He then goes to his pick up bank, exchanges the $100 for 4 fresh boxes of cents. He picks out an average of 10 wheat cents per box. He repeats this process 100 times in 100 days with the result being 1000 wheat cents, and $90 in cash.
Those 1000 wheat cents will easily fetch $40 + shipping (I get $50 for 1000 wheats). Even after 13% in seller fees for eBay and Paypal, Joe has $34.80 for those 1000 wheats, and $90 in cash, for a total of 124.80.
Jim has a 24% return on his investment in less than 6 months.
Joe still has a bucket of copper cents.
Not only is Jim going to repeat his efforts, he stands to find other cents of value, in particular, errors and die varieties, which will offer considerably more return on his investment than would staring at a bucket and relying on hope.

---

15 April 2017
Here's some news. 

Act Seeks 1c Coin and $1 Note Elimination; 5c Composition Change

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment