These have only been found with a few dates. 1996 D is the most common.
There is not much information about this die error. The most extensive information I've found so far comes from Jason Cuvelier's ErrorVariety.com where he lists 35 different dates and attributed dies including:
- 1959-D
- 1961-D
- 1964
- 1964-D, 2 attributed varieties
- 1985
- 1988
- 1989
- 1990
- 1991
- 1993-D
- 1996-D, by far the most common with 21 attributed varieties
- 2009-S Type 4 Proof
- 2010
In addition to Lincoln Cents, lathe lines have been identified on
- Jefferson Nickels: 1988-D, 2000, 2008 (2), 2008-D (2)
- Kennedy Halves: 1990, 2001
- Most recently in a 1982-P Washington Commemorative Half Dollar
One of the most informative websites regarding error coins is Error-Ref.com. The entry offered for lathe lines is concise, but explains the simple process of how they come into being:
Is this an error or a die variety?These concentric rings are produced by a lathe which shapes the cone-shaped face of the unfinished working die. The cone is supposed to be polished smooth before hubbing. If polishing is omitted or inadequate, the surface will remain covered by concentric lathe marks which will not be erased by subsequent hubbing.
![]() |
| Lathe Lines appear as concentric rings usually at the outer radius of the coin |
Finding them is tough, identifying them is easy, these lines stand out like a sore thumb. You can see them with the naked eye. I talked about these coins over social media. The responses were more like a story about a Bigfoot sighting than anything else.
- "I saw something that looked like a fingerprint and threw it back"
- "I've heard about those but never seen one."
- "There's no such thing"
They are out there.
UPDATE
10/18/18 1990-D Kennedy reported with lathe lines. Images are promising, included here with the approval of the discoverer, Mark Mills.




